Showing posts with label USA Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USA Politics. Show all posts

18 December 2010

Was Michael Moore's 'Sicko' banned in Cuba?

Well, according to a cable sent by officials at the US Special Interests Office in Havana, Cuba, published in the Guardian, it was banned from screening in Cuba as 'it painted such a "mythically" favourable picture of Cuba's healthcare system that the authorities feared it could lead to a popular backlash.' Of course, this has been picked up particularly by the right-wing media and immediately accepted as fact.

But is this actually the truth? According to Michael Moore, it's a load of crock! As Moore brilliantly stated on his blog, Sicko was shown on Cuban TV for everyone to see on 25 April 2008. Check out Moore's post here for full details. As Moore states, you'd think someone would have checked up with Cuba first to see whether this was actually the case. This is yet again proof that the leaked cables from Havana are full of information that the bosses in Washington would like to hear but have no reflection on reality. Those guys in Havana should get some tips off their colleagues then.

Greece tackling the big issues - photos on an official's website

'God's gift to the world'
The Guardian is reporting the latest US State Department cables published by WikiLeaks regarding how frustrated US officials are with the Europeans for having these 'human rights standards' which are getting in the way of the US government's 'war on terror'. Not to worry, so many other countries like China feel the same way! In their bitch on the Council of Europe's work, the Americans took it out on Thomas Hammarberg – the council's human rights commissioner – for his criticism of US counter-terrorism policy. The Guardian states that in a separate cable referring to comments made to the US by the Maltese ambassador, Hammarberg is accused of seeing himself as "God's gift to the world". Wow, before Cablegate I never realised how catty and petty these diplomats are. Of course, these US officials then turn around and applaud Hammarberg when he awards Cuban 'dissidents' awards. Hmm....

What has caught my attention though is this piece of diplomatic pettiness. US officials noted "a rather sad exchange" where Greece complained that Hammarberg had chosen photos of Turkey for his website that portrayed a positive image of the country. Big issue, no doubt. "The Greek ambassador criticised photos apparently chosen for Hammarberg's website regarding [his] recent official visit to Turkey". The cable goes on to say that "the Greek contrasted the 'vacation-like, very positive' images with those associated with the commissioner's visit to Greece." Of course, the Greeks were bitter at Hammarberg as the Council of Europe have been quite damning of Greece's treatment of refugees and its officially non-existent but very much present minorities. There's nothing that gets Greece more edgy that admitting there are indigenous ethnic groups in their country other than Greeks or whenever their arch enemy Turkey 'outshines' them. I mean, the Turks are supposed to be all evil, innit? Now, the crazy thing is that the photos of Turkey on the the commissioner's website don't look 'vacation-like' at all! Check them out here and see.

All I can say to Greece is that they need to build a bridge and get over it! We've had quite enough already.

17 December 2010

Vile! - US State department disrespect for death of Cuban leader's wife

Vilma Espín and her husband Raúl Castro standing next to Che Guevara

If there is one thing that the leaked US State Department cables published by WikiLeaks have shown, the World's self-appointed defender of transparency, freedom and 'human rights', the United States government, has proven to be riddled with double standards and hypocrisy in its actions. It will only push for the promotion of its version of human rights when it suits its interests, which tend to be the interests of US big business. When it hates a country, usually a poor place without any resources accessible to US large corporations, then the US State Government is, you could say, un-Christian, to say the least.

Case in point is the unpublicised cable that recently appeared on the WikiLeaks site giving the US 'Special Interests Office' in Havana's view of the death of the Cuban president Raúl Castro's wife Vilma Espin. All I can say is that the unsubstantiated allegations and innuendos are vile and grossly inaccurate. The level of hate and disdain displayed by Michael Parmly, author of the cable, towards the Castro brothers is impalpable.

Parmly's vile comments include doubting that Fidel Castro would care very much about
the loss of Vilma Espin or much else beyond his own personal legacy, insinuating that Raúl Castro and his late wife (who had been comrade-in-arms and partners since their guerilla days in the 1950s) had been 'estranged for the past few years', relishing the thought that the loss of his wife would cause Raúl Castro to 'lose his bearings' and opening the way for leadership instability to precipitate regime change, as well as seeing Espin's death serving as 'a dry run for other much-more-anticipated deaths in the ruling family'. Parmly, a US government official, is clearly stating that he would like to see the Cuban leadership dead - how Christian of him!

The most hypocritical and unsubstantiated belief Parmly states in this cable is that he says 'yes, both Fidel and Raul Castro are mass murderers and cruel leaders, but Raul always has had a parallel reputation as a family man.' What the...? First of all, how are they mass murderers and evil? Where are the mass graves to testify this? Obviously, based on the picture painted by the US State Department cables we have seen so far, the Castro brothers are 'evil' solely because they have tirelessly work against US government actions and business interests. Judging by the nature of this cable, do you blame them? And what's with Parmly dismissing the Castro brothers as 'mass murderers and evil' anyway? The US government should not criticise as that has never stopped it supporting many dictators and leaders who were actually mass murderers and evil. And how would you describe US military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan then? If that isn't mass murder, then what is? If you don't believe me, then check out the classified documents allegedly leaked by the very brave Bradley Manning to WikiLeaks.

Bradley Manning

Talking of which, disturbing reports are coming out that Manning, the US military intelligence analyst who, being a person of moral principle was disgusted at his own government and military's responsibility in the hidden deaths of many innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, decided to uncover this to the World for the sake of transparency (central to a democracy like the USA) and bring justice to those who perpetrated such crimes, is now facing 52 years in jail for his actions and is reportedly being held in inhumane conditions akin to torture. This is despite not having been formally charged with any 'crime' as yet. Furthermore, friends, family and supporters of Manning, have been facing US government harassment so as to shut them up - a tactic well used in all 'evil' totalitarian systems. What is also disgusting is that opponents to dropping the US military's 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' policy requiring gay US military personnel to keep quiet about their sexuality or else risk discharge, have used Manning, who happens to be gay, as an example that having homosexuals in such military positions threaten national security!

It says a lot about a society which will seek to severely punish and torture someone with a humane conscience but will reward those who kill innocent people in Iraq or Afghanistan. As his supporters' website states: exposing war crimes is not a crime.

15 December 2010

More Desperate Dictator Housewives - Tunisia's Leila Ben Ali

Tunisia's president Zine Ben Ali and his wife Leila. Guess who wears the pants?

If one thing can be said about the cables appearing via WikiLeaks and selected media, the officials at US Embassies are a bunch of gossipy queens who love reporting on the intriguing developments of the Dynasty-esque lifestyles of dictators and their families. And I don't blame them! Why follow the comparatively dull proceedings on Wisteria Lane when you have the likes of Azerbaijan's Mehriban Aliyeva and Uzbekistan's Gulnara Karimova providing more than enough (shocking) entertainment.

Central Asia, though, does not have a monopoly on such shenanigans. WikiLeaks have published cables from the embassy in Tunisia giving details on the corruption orchestrated by the 74 year old Zine Ben Ali and his family. Tunisia follows the set pattern when it comes to corrupt dictatorships - dictator runs country like a mafia fiefdom, is massively rich despite the general population being extremely poor, has family members and spoilt kids in control of the economy and in positions of power (and act above the law with immunity), lots of kickbacks and pay-offs, and then there's the obligatory glamorous but despised wife. This character would like to see herself as an Evita Peron though her public more see her as Lady MacBeth. In Tunisia's case, it's Leila Ben Ali (née Trabelsi). As the cable details, the 53 year old and her family are involved in many shady deals and practices, much to the ire of the Tunisian public. Along with the numerous allegations of Trabelsi corruption are "often barbs about their lack of education, low social status, and conspicuous consumption". The cable is fascinating gossip - have a read of what no longer can be read in Tunisia here, now that the government there blocked the sale (along with access to its website) of the Lebanese newspaper publishing these cables.

Some background on madame Leila. Apparently, as internet gossip goes (who needs priest wives anymore), she was previously a simply salon owner but she was also Zine Ben Ali's mistress (then prime minister). The ambitious minx made sure she became pregnant to her married lover, lied to him and told him she was having a boy (very cunning!). Unhappy with his first wife (who bore him a daughter) and eager for a son, Bel Ali divorced and brought Leila into his new career as president, installing himself after dethroning former president and founder of Tunisia, the dictator Bourguiba, in a 1987 medical coup in which the senior president was declared senile - which was true and constitutional permissible. Leila gave birth to a girl, but Ben Ali was president now and divorcing while head of state was not acceptable (though Bourguiba did, but he dropped a French woman in order to marry a Tunisian woman like any proud Arab nationalist). Leila made the most of her new status and soon enough her whole family was benefitting handsomely from privatization schemes in the 1990s. Securing “loans” from banks, the Trabelsis established their own hotel chain, airline and travel agency (The Karthago Group). It is also rumoured that when Ben Ali’s brother passed away, the Trabelsi’s inherited his drug trade.
Madame Leila looking very Sarah Palin

The details of the Ben Alis' and Tarbelsis' lavish lifestyle are given in this cable. As reported in the Guardian the picture painted of the Tunisian president's son-in-law, Mohamed Sakher El Materi, provides "a striking illustration of the great wealth and excess fuelling resentment of the presidential family." Much like Uzbekistan's Gulnara Karimova, he has achieved so much in his life. How many 28 year olds do you know own a shipping cruise line, concessions for Audi, Volkswagen, Porsche and Renault, a pharmaceutical manufacturing firm, and real estate companies? Jeez, he's done well. Details are also given of an elaborate dinner to woo McDonalds to the north African Mediterranean state with "ice cream and frozen yoghurt brought in by private plane from St Tropez", and of the family's pet tiger named Pasha, who lives in a cage and consumes four chickens a day. This "reminded the US envoy of Uday Hussein's lion cage in Baghdad". Hmmm... interesting that.

Nesrine and Mohamed Sakhner El Materi

But wait, the plot thickens. There's a new person in Tunisia Lane - Yasser Arafat's widow, Suha Arafat. Oh, she's a piece! Coming from a rich Palestinian Christian family (her father was an Oxford-educated banker), she married PLO leader Yasser Arafat, 44 years her senior, in 1990. However, they rarely spent much time together as Suha much prefered living in Paris. She did give birth to a daughter with the Palestinian leader - Zahwa in 1995. Despite most Palestinians living in abject poverty, Suha was notorious for her extravagant lifestyle and expensive shopping excursions, funded from the alleged US$100,000 a month stipend she was receiving from the Palestinian Authority coffers, which in turn was financed from generous aid packages provided by Western countries.

Yasser, Zahwa and Suha Arafat

With the French prosecutors starting to investigate the large sums of money being transferred to her account and the death of her husband in 2004, Suha and daughter quickly made their way to Tunis, where they were greeted with open arms by the Ben Alis and later given Tunisian citizenship in 2006. This is where the soap opera really takes off. As the US cable explains, Suha had a long association with Tunisia and even held a Tunisian diplomatic passport, but still embassy officials were puzzled as to why she would go for citizenship. The only reason they could see for this was "that Tunisian law forbids foreigners to own agricultural land", which the US ambassador Robert Godec cattily (but correctly) added that La Arafat "is not known to be an aspiring farmer". The most likely reason why is that La Arafat was setting up a company to build an international school in the country and Tunisian laws (when applied) only allow for citizens to have majority shares in such undertakings.

Lurking behind all this was the rumour that not only had Suha been in a relationship with her best friend Leila Ben Ali's brother, Belhassen, they had secretly married. Oooh! Check out the stud muffin....

However, as in all soap operas, things aren't what they seem to be. The Tunisian government quietly revoked Suha Arafat's Tunisian citizenship less than a year after awarding it. As this cable testifies, the possible reasons for this are numerous. There had been a major falling out between best friends Suha and Leila, partly to do with the repercussions of the new international school they founded (and Suha had invested 2.5 million euros in). In true greedy, power-mad style, La Ben Ali closed a rival, prestigious private school so as to force Tunisia's elite to send their little darlings to the new school started by her first ladies club. This resulted in a major backlash by the students' parents. Suha Arafat apparently told her best friend that she had crossed the line by doing this, to which a furious La Ben Ali retaliated by ordering her (now former) best friend's citizenship be taken away from her. Arafat at the time was on a visit to her brother in Malta who happens to be the Palestinian ambassador there.

In another twist to the story, the word has it that it wasn't Leila Ben Ali who ordered the rival school to close but Suha Arafat herself! And Leila was so, so, so mad about this that she took it out on that bitch Suha, who responded with a 'talk to the hand'. Then other 'theories' (i.e. gossip circulating around Tunis - you know, what the hairdresser had heard but promised to not tell anyone) that Suha Arafat had called Qaddafi and said 'gimme money', to which Qaddafi then called Ben Ali and told him off for not looking after Suha. Then there's the rumour that Suha ran off with loads of the Ben Ali's assets (which they had stolen anyway, but that's beside the point). Finally, this whole citizenship revoking saga could all be revenge for Suha having broken the heart of Leila's brother Belhassen. Wow, Krystle and Alexis on Dynasty have nothing on this!!!

With Suha stuck in Malta with her ambassador brother after being betrayed by her best friend Leila, what's a gal supposed to do? Of course, blab all the insider info of the Ben Alis to the US embassy. Don't tell anyone but Suha said that: the Tunisian president remained weakened by his battle with cancer; he simply does what his wife asks him to do; Leila Ben Ali and her family are stealing everything of value in the country; madame Ben Ali believes that she will succeed her husband as President of Tunisia and she dropped the American curriculum that had been planned for the international school because she fundamentally wants nothing to do with Americans, among other tidbits. The claws were out!


















That's where the story is so far. Suha and her daughter remain in Malta, in a house apparently funded by Qaddafi, and has been very quiet. Perhaps she may make a surprise reappearance in a later episode of Desperate Dictator Housewives?

I don't know why the US State Department have been embarrassed by these cables when you have ambassadors like Godec making points in their cables like in this case that " Suha Arafat has an ax to grind with the Ben Ali clan, so her allegations must be taken with a big grain of salt." The US State Department is reporting it as it is. What is embarrassing is that the US government continues to support these countries, in contradiction to the principles it allegedly stands for and promotes. As these cables allude, much to the frustration of the ambassadors involved, the US government though sees the only alternative type of government ever cultivating in these types of client states are mini-Irans. So it's the lesser of two evils, so to speak. Fair enough. Please, could you just be honest that that is the case then. Otherwise don't go taking the moral high road of 'promoting democracy and freedom of expression' if these principles are not actively promoted in those client states that need them.

13 December 2010

Desperate Central Asian Housewives

So which one is Gabrielle and which one is Bree? Out with the claws and in with the face lift! The Guardian has been revealing not-so-new info about lucky Central Asian bitches. It pays to be married to, or have daddy as, prez of your own Central Asian fiefdom. The latest US State Department cables have detailed more about the lifestyles of the rich and well-connected of those dictatorial and corrupt ex-Soviet republics that have a lot of natural resources that the West wants. First up, the glamour puss herself, Azerbaijan's first lady Mehriban Alieyeva. As the cable (worth the read for the level of cattiness - so Dynasty!) testifies:

Mehriban Aliyeva appears to have had substantial cosmetic surgery, presumably overseas, and wears dresses that would be considered provocative even in the Western world (reftel). On television, in photos, and in person, she appears unable to show a full range of facial expression.

The cable continues with the bitch gossip with this piece:

[Aliyeva] and her two daughters hosted Second Lady Lynne Cheney [then US vice-president Dick Cheney's wife] for dinner in September 2008. Prior to the Second Lady's arrival, while the three ladies were waiting for Mrs. Cheney's car, one Secret Service agent asked "which one of those is the mother?" Embassy officials and White House staff studied the three for several moments, and then the Embassy official said, "Well, logically the mother would probably stand in the middle."

A bowl of milk for the US embassy in Baku! This cable is the second in a series detailing the power clans of Azerbaijani society. Mehriban's family, the Pashayevs, control a large part of the Baku area and some of Azerbaijan's major industries. Aliyeva is also a deputy in the rubber-stamp Azerbaijani parliament (she gets immunity) and also sells Bentleys! Oh, and she is president of her late father-in-law's charity fund - these dictator wives are always into 'charity'. But check out these pics of La Aliyeva. What do you think - plastic surgery, botox, alien? The first shot is her with the daughters. Guess who's mama?

Mutton dressed as lamb would be too kind to say here
Someone gets their glamour tips from Turkish soap operas
I detect she could be trying to smile here
Continuing with the theme of rich bitch Central Asians. The Guardian seems to have hit gold with the cables detailing the vile daughter of Uzbekistani dictator Islom Karimov, Gulnara. La Karimova has been a 'favourite' of mine, especially as for someone who hasn't even reached 40, she's done it all! Pop star, designs jewellry, AIDS charities, PhD, studied in the US, spends time with Tom and Katie Cruise, university lecturer... everything. Oh, and she has her hands in every profitable business in Uzbekistan, only that she constantly denies it. Just one thing - this is all news to the Guardian and many in the West. This is where these WikiLeaks-leaked cables fall short - this is just not news. Anyone with a fleeting interest in Uzbekistan could have told you this. Actually, the 'news' the Guardian is gleening from this cable is already out-of-date. Gulnara's pop career is over, and she is not 'alleged' to be living in Geneva or Spain - she does live in Spain. It has something to do with the fact that she's the Uzbekistani ambassador to Spain.

But the Guardian and the original cable did get one thing right - she is detested in Uzbekistan (and beyond). Here are some shots of her excellency...

Gosh I'm smart!

Keeping up with the no-taste tyrant tradition!

Gulnara at the Lacroix fashion show - did you expect anything less?
Now what would Michael Kors on Project Runway have to say about this frock?
Now, the disgusting part. What these cables do show is that the United States is aware of the excesses these women live, thanks mainly to the corrupt system that their menfolk have been able to cultivate. Fully aware of this, what does the United States government, the worldwide defender of freedom and democracy do? It supports these countries! As what a recent article on the Common Dreams website about Central Asia pointed out, it's easier for the West to obtain the huge amounts of natural resources these countries possess by paying a kickback to a dictator rather than having to negotiate with an elected parliament. The only Central Asian president to have been democractically elected in the region was Kyrgyzstan's Askar Akayev - who was ousted by a US-funded 'colour revolution' in 2005 because, get this, he was 'autocratic and corrupt'. He was only replaced by Kurmanbek Bakiyev, who along with his son Maxim, were so unbelievably corrupt (and also subject to many WikiLeaks cables) that the Kyrgyz toppled them in a popular revolution earlier this year.

In the meantime, while these cables have brought attention to the high level of corruption in the region, these ruling cliques still get away with daylight robbery. So much for the dream that the collapse of the USSR would usher a new age of freedom for these people. The shame is that these tittilating stories of excess may be entertainment for those in the West but only casts continued misery for those who live under their rule.

09 December 2010

And they don't notice the irony?

While the US Department of State is quick in denying that it is applying any pressure on anyone to silence WikiLeaks (it's just pure coincidence that all these companies are cutting off funds and website), it was proud to announce that next May it will be hosting "UNESCO’s World Press Freedom Day event in 2011, from May 1 - May 3 in Washington, D.C". According to the press release, UNESCO is the only UN agency with the mandate to promote freedom of expression and its corollary, freedom of the press.

Guess what the theme will be? Well the rather wanky sounding '21st Century Media: New Frontiers, New Barriers'. Without noticing the irony, it goes on to boast the following:

The United States places technology and innovation at the forefront of its diplomatic and development efforts. New media has empowered citizens around the world to report on their circumstances, express opinions on world events, and exchange information in environments sometimes hostile to such exercises of individuals’ right to freedom of expression. At the same time, we are concerned about the determination of some governments to censor and silence individuals, and to restrict the free flow of information. We mark events such as World Press Freedom Day in the context of our enduring commitment to support and expand press freedom and the free flow of information in this digital age.

Of course, an event like this can't go without some award ceremony. The UNESCO Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize, decided by an 'independent' jury of international journalists, "honours a person, organization or institution that has notably contributed to the defence and/or promotion of press freedom, especially where risks have been undertaken". So then, will Julian Assange and WikiLeaks be in the running for that? I guess not. More likely someone in one of those 'bad' countries such as Cuba, China, Russia or Venezuela will get it - just look at the majority of its past recipients.

Rest assured, there's also a Facebook page for this event; however, comments on it are being 'moderated' (censored, in other words).

Crazy! This reminds me of the hypocrisy of countries such as the former USSR, or supposed democracies like Russia whose constitutions enshrine(d) the freedoms of speech, religion, protest, media, expression etc. when in practice they will apply pressure on those who pose a threat.

Tackling the big issues - Canada's anti-American propaganda

Thank you Hone for bringing this to attention. WikiLeaks, via the NY Times, has highlighted a very pressing issue for the Americans - they are being presented in a bad light by Canadian TV! I mean, North Korea - Canada... the same, really. Have a read of it! I love the sound of 'Little Mosque on the Prairie". Check out the (the very serious) conclusion:

While there is no single answer to this trend, it does serve to demonstrate the importance of constant creative, and adequately-funded public-diplomacy engagement with Canadians, at all levels and in virtually all parts of the country [i.e. more propaganda - ed.]. We need to do everything we can to make it more difficult for Canadians to fall into the trap of seeing all U.S. policies as the result of nefarious faceless U.S. bureaucrats anxious to squeeze their northern neighbor. While there are those who may rate the need for [US Government] public-diplomacy programs as less vital in Canada than in other nations because our societies are so much alike, we clearly have real challenges here that simply must be adequately addressed.

Mate, it's just TV! Really, blame Canada!

In case you missed them...

There is plenty of information and analysis on the net available about WikiLeaks. Only problem is that they are usually tucked away from general view and require a little bit of effort finding. It's much like how the embarrassing news of the crash of the Soviet Union's pride of technology, the supersonic passenger aircraft Tupolev Tu-144 (or Concordeski as it was dubbed by the Western media), in front of the West at the Paris Air Show in 1973, was reported in the USSR with just a 27 word article tucked at the bottom of page 6 of the Moscow daily Pravda. Or how critical and informative documentaries are shown at 2am on a Tuesday morning. This is the well-tried and highly useful tactic of downplaying information which otherwise could change public opinion. On the same token, they have fulfilled their minimum obligation of actually reporting it (albeit not as effectively).

Nevertheless, here are some articles to read up on.

Anatol Lieven, professor in the War Studies Department of King's College, London, examines the impact of WikiLeaks. Lieven points out that "despite the impression given by much of the media, just because US diplomats believe something and report their views in private does not necessarily make it true".

Lieven's conclusions about WikiLeaks and its role in democracy, and to bringing attention to real opinion (without requiring US diplomats to be the messenger) are spot on:

On the security threat which has so often been cited as an objection, it seems that Wikileaks have taken care to exclude anything that can endanger specific US agents or actions.

Another objection is that for the need for confidentiality in diplomacy - so that diplomats can express candid views to their home governments without fearing that they will be spread all over the media.

This is a much stronger argument, but in the end it is outweighed - in the West, not obviously in Russia - by the fact that we are after all supposed to be democracies, and our electorates have the democratic right to know more than they have done in recent years about the conduct of their government's foreign policy.

Far too much misinformation and outright lying has surrounded the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Overall, we in the West now live in an atmosphere of security hysteria and obsessive secrecy that would have filled our ancestors with horror.

If the threat of more Wikileaks releases makes this less likely in future, so much the better.

As to the effects on the tender sensibilities of Silvio Berlusconi, Vladimir Putin and Hamid Karzai of private US official opinions of them - well, how very tragic.

The more these people know of how the outside world regards them the better for their countries. From this point of view, Wikileaks might almost be seen as rather a good way for a US administration to pass on candid messages that it could not possibly deliver officially.


Here, the BBC reports that efforts by the USA to prosecute Julian Assange and WikiLeaks will be very difficult. One strong point which shoots the US Government's criticism that these leaks would endanger lives is that in November Mr Assange contacted US Ambassador in London Louis Susman asking for help redacting information that could put individuals at risk. When the US government refused, Mr Assange wrote he therefore concluded the risk of harm was "fanciful" while stating he had no interest in hurting US national security. Plus, any espionage charges will be considered 'political', which would make extradition from Sweden or the UK to the USA very difficult. This makes US efforts to actually 'find' a way to prosecute Assange extremely worrying in terms of the rule of law, as this proves that rather having someone obviously commit a crime, the US authorities will tailor the law around to make sure their target can be charged. Rather much like what Russia did to Khodorkovsky.

08 December 2010

Barack, Hillary... just to remind you...

It seems like that Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton have forgotten some of the things that have said about internet censorship...

Obama said to Chinese students in November 2009 while on a visit there:
I'm a big believer in openness when it comes to the flow of information. I think that the more freely information flows, the stronger the society becomes, because then citizens of countries around the world can hold their own governments accountable. They can begin to think for themselves. That generates new ideas. It encourages creativity.

And so I've always been a strong supporter of open Internet use. I'm a big supporter of non-censorship. This is part of the tradition of the United States that I discussed before, and I recognize that different countries have different traditions. I can tell you that in the United States, the fact that we have free Internet -- or unrestricted Internet access is a source of strength, and I think should be encouraged.


And what did Hillary Clinton have to say at the Newseum in Washington D.C. in January this year? Well, this:
...technologies with the potential to open up access to government and promote transparency can also be hijacked by governments to crush dissent and deny human rights. In the last year, we've seen a spike in threats to the free flow of information. China, Tunisia, and Uzbekistan have stepped up their censorship of the internet...

On their own, new technologies do not take sides in the struggle for freedom and progress. But the United States does. We stand for a single internet where all of humanity has equal access to knowledge and ideas. And we recognize that the world's information infrastructure will become what we and others make of it.


You remember? Well, if you tend to forget these things, how about you do what Sarah Palin does and write it on your hand.

Australian support for Assange growing

Amazing how much support from Australia has grown for Julian Assange. It was only a few days ago that I reported how Australia had not accepted the Wikileaks founder as one of their own, but word has spread and the thanks to the power of Australian parochialism, plus a chipped ego ironically due to a Wikileaks-published US diplomatic cable downplaying Australia as 'a rock solid but uninfluential US ally', the Australian public, along with some surprise prominent right-wing elements, have voiced their support for Assange and that everything be done to protect him. Former Australian Prime Minister and current foreign minister Kevin Rudd, himself from the Australian state of Queensland as is Assange, who has been subject to many scaving and potentially damaging cables published by Wikileaks (described as a 'control freak' and suggesting China be militarily attacked), has brushed aside the comments made about him and has came out with a little bit a reason that has been conveniently overlooked by the Americans - it was the Americans who committed the crime of leaking the cables, not Assange. This very much echoes the opinion piece penned by Assange himself, published yesterday in the Murdoch-owned newspaper 'The Australian'. This stance by Rudd is quite opposite to that of the current Prime Minister, Julia Gillard. It must be pointed out that Rudd lost his position as PM last year following a palace coup orchestrated by Gillard.

The biggest revelation has been that former conservative Australian Prime Minister and 'God' to many Australians, John Howard, has also lent his support to Assange. Howard's comments were much of the same nature as Rudd's, though this comes as a surprise of sorts as his term in office was characterised by a slavish following of US foreign policy. What we now have here is that Howard is diametrically opposite in his views towards the Wikileaks issue from his ideological allies in the USA who are calling for Assange's death. Likewise, Julia Gillard, ostensibly 'left-wing' shares a view closer to those of her US right-wing adversaries.

Australian political commentator, writer, humourist and self-confessed grump, Bob Ellis, had interesting points to say (as per usual) about the whole Assange affair. Ellis points out that those in the US who are calling for Assange to be killed are usually the first to defend the First Amendment protecting the freedom of speech, and that there is a difference between Americans and Australians. Ellis too emphasises that without whistleblowers then so many bad things would not have been exposed. Though Ellis lists various Australian events, we should consider that had Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward not published the Watergate tapes recordings, then we wouldn't have had Watergate. Should they be killed for what they did? Or for something more Hollywood, by the reckoning of the likes of Sarah Palin, Erin Brockovich should then be killed for what she did in exposing the wrongdoings of corporate companies.

It's good to see that Australia is getting behind Assange, though I hope that this is more because of what he represents and not solely because he is Aussie.

07 December 2010

These diplomats have a sense of humour! Azerbaijani mobsters... umm... politicians and the funny US diplomat

Still trawling through the mass of cables published by Wikileaks. Even with Assange's arrest today, the whistle blower site will continue unabated in revealing these documents. Quite hypocritical that we have politicians like Australia's Prime Minister Julia Gillard condemning Wikileaks with comments like 'the foundation stone of it is an illegal act, information was taken and that was illegal', when she herself has used and published illegally obtained leaks when it politically suited her.

What has embarrassed the US government most is that the it has exposed the two-faced nature of its international diplomacy and that it knows that some of its allies are hardly transparent and operate contrary to the principles of freedom, democracy and equality that it supposed espouses and encourages. A case in point is the former Soviet republic of Azerbaijan, which despite being autocratically ruled as a personal fiefdom of the Aliyev family, complete with dynastic succession, the oil-rich and strategically important country is a firm ally of the United States. Even when the Opposition started what it hoped would end up like Georgia and Ukraine as another 'colour' revolution did not receive support from the United States or Europe, despite their principles. The Aliyevs and their cronies and beneficiaries enjoy Western and Russian protection.

Nevertheless, this cable gives in-depth details to the shady dealings of Azerbaijan's most powerful families - AZERBAIJAN: WHO OWNS WHAT VOL. 2 - THE MINISTER OF EMERGENCY SITUATIONS, BELUGA CAVIAR, AND FRUIT JUICE by a cynical and humorous Don Lu. Some of his choice comments include:

- He renames the Azerbaijani Ministry of Emergency Services (MES) as 'the Ministry of Everything Significant'. This wide-ranging ministry is basically a 'cash cow' for Azerbaijan's powerful families for amassing bribes and pay-offs. Part of its competences is construction licensing, which covers building inspectors who can interfere with, delay, or stop any construction project they declare to be "unsafe". In fact, MES staff have previously warned American and other foreign businessmen that their purview covers anything that is associated with temperature, pressure, or isotopes - categories broadly interpreted to include just about everything under the sun.

- Under the title 'His Boys and Their Toys', Lu describes the shady dealings of London-educated Nijat and Tale Heydarov, the wealthy sons of the head of the MES Kalamaddin Heydarov. The boys' toys include expensive private jets, a wide arrays of businesses and concessions and even a football team, which Lu puts down to as a small-scale effort to replicate the Chelsea antics of Russia's Roman Abramovich. As Lu describes, the Qabala squad is a virtual United Nations team, with players from across Europe, Latin America and Africa - the best team money can buy, at least for central Azerbaijan. Bitch!

- The Heydarovs are also active in cultural endeavors. Kamaladdin Heydarov is a composer and has written a song about former Azerbaijani President Heydar Aliyev that was sung by Azeri singer Aghadadash Aghayev. Now that's definitely grovelling and brownie points. Mrs Heydarova is ethnic Korean, and with Heydarov himself being a Koreaphile; he is President of the Azerbaijan Taekwondo Federation and owner of the recently opened high-end Korean restaurant Shilla.Korean diplomats have confirmed that Heydarov was the protector for several major business deals, but have complained that many of these deals have gone awry after the Korean firms refused to pay adequate patronage to Heydarov.

- Under the title 'It's Good to Be King', Lu gives information how the regions of Qabala, Masalli, and Lenkeran in southern and central Azerbaijan are the Heydarov's main power bases. Postsuspects that Heydarov continues to control the State Customs Committee and wield influence over the Ministry of Taxes, the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources, and Ministry of Economic Development, which is now led by a former Ministry of Taxes official. Additionally, of course, Heydarov profits significantly from widespread activities of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. That ministry, according to observers, may be the most sought after employer in official Baku, as Heydarov has made a reputation for paying salaries on time and in full. Employees benefit from perks of MES employment, such as the ability to enroll children in one of Baku's best-looking and best-financed public schools. Measures like these, contacts report, create a loyal following for the minister among his minions.

- The final installment called 'Turf Wars: Don't Cross Kamaladdin' (like he's the Zohan) talks about his tiff with the Agriculture Minister over grain (move over J.R.). Apparently Heydarov has a history of eliminating opponents, with Lu even suggesting that the assassination of an Azerbaijani air force chief was the Minister's work. Watch out for that dead horse in the bed!

Lu promises with the next episode to go to task with another Azerbaijani bigwig Ziya Mammadov. He doesn't seem to be one for the bleeding obvious when you get a recent television report asking whether the Mammadovs controlled mysterious construction company ZQAN Holding; the reporter pointed out the letters of ZQAN matched the initials of father Ziya, mother Qanira, son Anar, and daughter Nigar. A ZQAN representative brushed this aside as innuendo.

Stay tuned after a word from our sponsor...

At the end of the day... saying it as it is

The US State Department cables published by Wikileaks have shown the true face behind the sweet talk and spin that characterises diplomacy and international politicis. An interesting and frank conversion was reported by the US embassy in Paris with an official of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Roland Galharague, which gives a true and blunt account about Serbia's aspirations for EU membership and Kosovo.

Historically, the French have been keen allies of the Serbs, with Jacques Chirac being initially against the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, for instance. However, with Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence in 2008, France forsake Serbia's pleas and recognised the fledgling state. Despite much legal wrangling over the legitimacy of Kosovo's independence, the Serbs have found that their case being rebuked by large international organisations and legal institutions. However, as Galharague stated to the Americans, Serbian Foreign Minister Jeremic "seems to believe Serbia can win on Kosovo and win EU entry. We need to let him know this is not true". So no matter what Serbia does, it won't win anyway.

Serbia's current 'pro-western' government maintains eventual EU membership as its primary goal. However, the fact that Serbia claims Kosovo as a constituent part even though effectively it's now a separate, independent entity recognised as such by 22 out of the EU's 27 member states, and the legal ambiguity this creates, makes EU accession near impossible. In true 'carrot and stick' style, the EU superficially maintains the position that the issues of Kosovo and Serbian entry into the EU are not formally linked. However, this concept is beleived by no one, but still, rather naively, that they are fooling the Serbs nonetheleess. The State Department cable reveals that Western diplomats and Serb politicians alike know that there are no illusions. "There was no formal conditionality," Galharague said, adding that the Serbs now understand that to be a member of the EU they must eventually recognize Kosovo. "We told them we do not want another Cyprus," he explained, referring to Cyprus' controversial EU accession in 2004 as a divided island where EU legislation remains partly "suspended" in the northern part of the island which is outside of the government in Nicosia's control. Nonetheless, Galharague predicted the Serbs will likely go ahead with the U.N. resolution in any case, and the USG and the EU will be forced to oppose it.

So why do they keep on playing the public with this idea that Kosovo and EU membership are not linked when essentially they are for Serbia? Well, it's to ensure that the EU and Serbian government can impose what otherwise would be unpopular changes, all with the cynical excuse that 'this is a long-term good in preparation for EU membership'. The image is sold that EU membership will mean the dawning of an age of immense and immediate prosperity. However, the reality has shown that this is far from the case. Just ask anyone in Greece and Ireland, let alone Bulgaria and Romania as to what prosperity EU membership has bestowed them.

Nevertheless, the reality is that Serbia will not join the EU. Serbia, by its very nature and core identity cannot see Kosovo ever being separated again, even though essentially it already has. Along with this reality is Galharague's blunt but honest claim that "At the end of the day, though, Serbia must recognize Kosovo if it wants to join the EU". I can tell you now Galharague, that's just not going to happen. That's if, unless, some Serbian premier wants a bullet to his head like Zoran Djindjić.

05 December 2010

China and North Korea - split or splat?

WikiLeaks and its latest release of hundreds of cables sent by US diplomats have caused much speculation and confirmation of the nature of many bilateral relationships. One relationship in particular has produced mixed signals as to its direction - China's relationship to its neighbour North Korea (DPR Korea). A series of cables from US embassy staff in South Korea detailed how South Korean officials mentioned from some other diplomats who talked candidly to unnamed Chinese diplomats in places like Kazakhstan how the Chinese are quite annoyed with the North Koreans and even would like Korea to be reunified under Seoul's command. The Guardian ran with the angle that China is ready to ditch its ally: a line quickly followed by most of the World's media. The New York Times, however, took a more cautious, and ultimately wiser view that this does not mean China is about to break with its ostensibly Communist neighbour in favour of the encroachment of capitalism. North Korean-watchers, who were sidelined from this whole debate, were quick to dismiss the claims made in the cables as "South Korean wishful thinking". So who is correct then?

China's relationship with North Korea is not easy; however, it can be safely said that China is the last country to want DPR Korea to go. This relationship is much like the USA-Israel alliance. The USA finds Israel a troublesome ally who will not be pressured into doing things it doesn't want. Nevertheless, despite this 'annoyance' (i.e. the small guy not doing everything that the big guy tells it to do), the US won't suddenly ditch this important ally in favour of the Arabs. The same analogy can be said of China towards DPR Korea.

There is much history between the Koreans and the Chinese. Whether it be significant Chinese cultural influence over the centuries to Chinese involvement in the Korean war, there are very strong ties between the two neighbours. During the Cold War period DPR Korea played off the two antagonistic Communist superpowers - China and USSR - to ensure the provision of as much aid as possible (mainly weapons, technology and fuel). The 1960s in particular was a period when DPR Korea was closer to China, as Kim Il-sung joined with Mao Zedong in opposing the Soviet Union's de-Stalinisation and detente policies. Evidence of this renewed link with China was the then brief reappearance of Chinese characters (hanja) back into the (North) Korean language and how Korean policy mirrored that applied by the Chinese. For instance, China's Great Leap Forward starting in 1958 was the inspiration for DPR Korea's Chollima movement (which started soon after the Great Leap Forward though history books in North Korea now indicate a start year of 1956 to hide any parallels). DPR Korea also launched its own version of the Cultural Revolution in 1966, without ever finishing it. Kim Il-sung was recast as a playwright (as opposed to Mao being a poet) and that 'masterpiece revolutionary plays' supposedly written by the 'Great Leader' in his youth were 'rediscovered' and quickly became the staple form of mass entertainment. In following the Chinese pattern forced by Mao's wife Jiang Qing, these 'revolutionary plays' (with names like 'The Flower Girl' and 'Sea of Blood') were also adapted into 'revolutionary operas' and are still performed today. In fact, one Korean art troupe, named after the 'Sea of Blood' revolutionary opera, staged a tour of China this year performing a Chinese revolutionary opera. Relations between China and DPR Korea started to wane in the late 1960s when the Chinese Red Guards began to criticise Kim Il-sung, and later in the 1970s when China embarked on market reforms and normalised relations with the United States. DPR Korea then turned back to the USSR in the 1980s, but still kept the game going with China nonetheless to ensure the gravy train kept rolling. It has only been in the past two years though that the North Korean propaganda machine has gone back into full force to emphasise the 'eternal friendship' with China, mirroring the time when its large northern neighbour once again became North Korea's main source of foreign investment and aid. This coincided immediately after South Korea's end to its 'Sunshine Policy' with the election of current president, the conservative Lee Myung-bak.

So what's in it for China then? And why would they say such things, as claimed by South Korean and US diplomats? China has been under (supposed) intense pressure from the USA and Japan to coax the North Koreans to stop its nuclear weapons programme. The way this is being presented in the Western media is that this should be a straightforward matter and that it should only be natural that the Chinese follow US orders. Consequently the West is baffled as to why China won't pressure the North Koreans, even though it says it will, as acts quite shocked when the Chinese show restraint or even defend its ally. Of course, the Chinese point of view is never taken into account here, which is the norm in the myopic and selfish mindset displayed by Western officials. Basically China will not be pressured by the West to act against its own interests. As this Chinese website attests, Beijing will not be working in the interests of countries it sees as ultimately plotting against it - namely the USA and Japan. However, China is willing to say the nice things to please these countries but not follow through with them - that is part of the diplomacy game. Hence why that Chinese official may have said to the South Korean that it would like Seoul to take over the North.

Claims made that China wants Korea to be reunified by the South are obviously South Korean wishful thinking. The last thing China wants is to have a nationalistic American ally in the form of a reunified Korea bordering a sensitive part of China that is populated with a large Korean population. Later calls for these Korean-populated areas to join Korea could threaten China's territorial integrity; something Beijing has proven in areas like Tibet and Xinjiang that it's willing to do anything to avoid. As well, by having a US ally on its border is seen as a potential launching pad for the spread of anti-Communist Party activities within China. There's also a humanitarian aspect to this reunification in that many North Koreans who would be totally bewildered by the capitalist changes that a Seoul-ruled, reunified Korea would impose, or the fear of retribution for having been a Korean Worker's Party member, that a huge influx of political refugees into the comparative system-familiarity of China could happen. China does not relish the prospect of potentially millions of Koreans pouring into their country. So having a reliant neighbour that can be annoying but does the right thing by paying 'tribute' to China like it should (in Chinese eyes), is a far better prospect than having a Seoul-lead Korea destabilising Communist Party-led China as how the South Koreans and its US and Japanese allies would have in store. Actually, what I see would be the best scenario for China would be Korea reunified under the rule of the North's Korean Worker's Party and then adopting the Chinese 'socialist market economy' model - but this is as unlikely as the South taking the North now.

So do not expect there will be any breakthrough by the Chinese to get the North Koreans to give up their nuclear weapons or that Seoul gains control all the way to the Chinese border. It's a case of 'better the devil you know'.

04 December 2010

Dagestani wedding - a novel?

If only it was a novel. If one thing that the latest WikiLeaks publication of US embassy cables have shown, there are some budding novelists working for the US Department of State. One cable in particular which has caught the attention of Caucasus watchers is this one detailing the intrigue at the wedding of a local bigwig's son from Russia's southern, majority-Muslim republic of Dagestan. Fascinating reading! Really, Mr Burns the US diplomat should ditch his job and turn to novel writing. It also shows that western diplomatic attitudes and understanding of not just the Caucasus but of any place west of Venice is still stuck in the 19th Century imperialism as the clichéd observations and patronising descriptions in the following 'prose' attest:

Thursday, 31 August 2006, 06:39
SUBJECT: A CAUCASUS WEDDING
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Daniel A. Russell

Summary
-------
Weddings are elaborate in Dagestan, the largest autonomy in the North Caucasus. On August 22 we attended a wedding in Makhachkala, Dagestan's capital: Duma member and Dagestan Oil Company chief Gadzhi Makhachev's son married a classmate. The lavish display and heavy drinking concealed the deadly serious North Caucasus politics of land, ethnicity, clan, and alliance. The guest list spanned the Caucasus power structure -- guest starring Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov -- and underlined just how personal the region's politics can be. End Summary.
Dagestani weddings are serious business: a forum for showing respect, fealty and alliance among families; the bride and groom themselves are little more than showpieces. Weddings take place in discrete parts over three days. On the first day the groom's family and the bride's family simultaneously hold separate receptions. During the receptions the groom leads a delegation to the bride's reception and escorts her back to his own reception, at which point she formally becomes a member of the groom's family, forsaking her old family and clan. The next day, the groom's parents hold another reception, this time for the bride's family and friends, who can "inspect" the family they have given their daughter to. On the third day, the bride's family holds a reception for the groom's parents and family.
Father of the Groom
-------------------
On August 22, Gadzhi Makhachev married off his 19 year-old son Dalgat to Aida Sharipova. The wedding in Makhachkala, which we attended, was a microcosm of the social and political relations of the North Caucasus, beginning with Gadzhi's own biography. Gadzhi started off as an Avar clan leader. Enver Kisriyev, the leading scholar of Dagestani society, told us that as Soviet power receded from Dagestan in the late 1980s, the complex society fell back to its pre-Russian structure. The basic structural unit is the monoethnic "jamaat", in this usage best translated as canton or commune. The ethnic groups themselves are a Russian construct: faced with hundreds of jamaats, the 19th century Russian conquerors lumped cantons speaking related dialects together and called them Avar, Dargin, etc. to reduce the number of "nationalities" in Dagestan to 38. Ever since then, jamaats within each ethnic group have been competing with one another to lead the ethnic group. This competition is especially marked among the Avars, the largest nationality in Dagestan.

As Russian power faded, each canton fielded a militia to defend its people both in the mountains and the capital Makhachkala. Gadzhi became the leader from his home canton of Burtunay, in Kazbek Rayon. He later asserted pan-Avar ambitions, founding the Imam Shamil Popular Front -- named after the great Avar leader of mountaineer resistance to the Russians -- to promote the interests of the Avars and of Burtunay's role within the ethnic group. Among his exploits was a role in the military defense of Dagestan against the 1999 invasion from Chechnya by Shamil Basayev and al-Khattab, and his political defense of Avar villages under pressure in Chechnya, Georgia and Azerbaijan.

Gadzhi has cashed in the social capital he made from nationalism, translating it into financial and political capital -- as head of Dagestan's state oil company and as the single-mandate representative for Makhachkala in Russia's State Duma. His dealings in the oil business -- including close cooperation with U.S. firms -- have left him well off enough to afford luxurious houses in Makhachkala, Kaspiysk, Moscow, Paris and San Diego; and a large collection of luxury automobiles, including the Rolls Royce Silver Phantom in which Dalgat fetched Aida from her parents' reception. (Gadzhi gave us a lift in the Rolls once in Moscow, but the legroom was somewhat constricted by the presence of a Kalashnikov carbine at our feet. Gadzhi has survived numerous assassination attempts, as have most of the still-living leaders of Dagestan. In Dagestan he always travels in an armored BMW with one, sometimes two follow cars full of uniformed armed guards).

Gadzhi has gone beyond his Avar base, pursuing a multi-ethnic cadre policy to develop a network of loyalists. He has sent Dagestani youths, including his sons, to a military type high school near San Diego (we met one graduate, a Jewish boy from Derbent now studying at San Diego state. He has no plans to enter the Russian military).

Gadzhi's multi-ethnic reach illustrates what the editor of the Dagestani paper "Chernovik" told us: that in the last few years the development of inter-ethnic business clans has eroded traditional jamaat loyalties.

But the Avar symbolism is still strong. Gadzhi's brother, an artist from St. Petersburg, ordered as a wedding gift a life-sized statue of Imam Shamil. Shamil is the iconic national symbol, despite his stern and inflexible character (portrayed in Tolstoy's Hadji-Murat as the mountaineers' tyrannical counterpart to the absolutist Tsar). Connection with Shamil makes for nobility among Avars today. Gadzhi often mentions that he is a descendant on his mother's side of Gair-Bek, one of Shamil's deputies.
The Day Before
--------------
Gadzhi's Kaspiysk summer house is an enormous structure on the shore of the Caspian, essentially a huge circular reception room -- much like a large restaurant -- attached to a 40-meter high green airport tower on columns, accessible only by elevator, with a couple of bedrooms, a reception room, and a grotto whose glass floor was the roof of a huge fish tank. The heavily guarded compound also boasts a second house, outbuildings, a tennis court, and two piers out into the Caspian, one rigged with block and tackle for launching jet skis. The house filled up with visitors from all over the Caucasus during the afternoon of August 21. The Chair of Ingushetia's parliament drove in with two colleagues; visitors from Moscow included politicians, businessmen and an Avar football coach. Many of the visitors grew up with Gadzhi in Khasavyurt, including an Ingush Olympic wrestler named Vakha who seemed to be perpetually tipsy. Another group of Gadzhi's boyhood friends from Khasavyurt was led by a man who looked like Shamil Basayev on his day off -- flip-flops, t-shirt, baseball cap, beard -- but turned out to be the chief rabbi of Stavropol Kray. He told us he has 12,000 co-religionists in the province, 8,000 of them in its capital, Pyatigorsk. 70 percent are, like him, Persian-speaking Mountain Jews; the rest are a mixture of Europeans, Georgians and Bukharans.

Also present was Chechnya's Duma member, Khalid (aka Ruslan) Yamadayev, brother of the commander of the notorious Vostok Battalion. He was reserved at the time, but in a follow-up conversation in Moscow on August 29 (please protect) he complained that Chechnya, lacking experts to develop programs for economic recovery, is simply demanding and disposing of cash from the central government. When we pressed him on disappearances, he admitted some took place, but claimed that often parents alleged their children had been abducted when in fact their sons had run off to join the fighters or -- in a case the week before -- they had murdered their daughter in an honor killing. We mentioned the abduction of a widow of Basayev, allegedly to gain access to his money. Khalid said he had not heard of the case, but knew that Basayev had had no interest in wealth; he may have been a religious fanatic, but he was a "normal" person. The fighters who remain are not a serious military force, in Khalid's view, and many would surrender under the proper terms and immunities. He himself is arranging the immunity of a senior official of the Maskhadov era, whose name he would not reveal.

During lunch, Gadzhi took a congratulatory call from Dagestan's president, Mukhu Aliyev. Gadzhi told Aliyev how honored he would be if Aliyev could drop in at the wedding reception. There was a degree of tension in the conversation, which was between two figures each implicitly claiming the mantle of leadership of the Avars. In the event, Aliyev snubbed Gadzhi and did not show up for the wedding, though the rest of Dagestan's political leadership did.

Though Gadzhi's house was not the venue for the main wedding reception, he ensured that all his guests were constantly plied with food and drink. The cooks seemed to keep whole sheep and whole cows boiling in a cauldron somewhere day and night, dumping disjointed fragments of the carcass on the tables whenever someone entered the room. Gadzhi's two chefs kept a wide variety of unusual dishes in circulation (in addition to the omnipresent boiled meat and fatty bouillon). The alcohol consumption before, during and after this Muslim wedding was stupendous. Amidst an alcohol shortage, Gadzhi had flown in from the Urals thousands of bottles of Beluga Export vodka ("Best consumed with caviar"). There was also entertainment, beginning even that day, with the big-name performers appearing both at the wedding hall and at Gadzhi's summer house. Gadzhi's main act, a Syrian-born singer named Avraam Russo, could not make it because he was shot a few days before the wedding, but there was a "gypsy" troupe from St. Petersburg, a couple of Azeri pop stars, and from Moscow, Benya the Accordion King with his family of singers. A host of local bands, singing in Avar and Dargin, rounded out the entertainment, which was constant and extremely amplified.

The main activity of the day was eating and drinking -- starting from 4 p.m., about eight hours worth, all told -- punctuated, when all were laden with food and sodden with drink, with a bout of jet skiing in the Caspian. After dinner, though, the first band started an informal performance -- drums, accordion and clarinet playing the lezginka, the universal dance of the Caucasus. To the uninitiated Westerner, the music sounds like an undifferentiated wall of sound. This was a signal for dancing: one by one, each of the dramatically paunchy men (there were no women present) would enter the arena and exhibit his personal lezginka for the limit of his duration, usually 30 seconds to a minute. Each ethnic group's lezginka was different -- the Dagestani lezginka the most energetic, the Chechen the most aggressive and belligerent, and the Ingush smoother.
Wedding Day 1
-------------
An hour before the wedding reception was set to begin the "Marrakech" reception hall was full of guests -- men taking the air outside and women already filling a number of the tables inside, older ones with headscarves chaperoning dozens of teenaged girls. A Dagestani parliamentarian explained that weddings are a principal venue for teenagers -- and more importantly their parents -- to get a look at one another with a view to future matches. Security was tight -- police presence on the ground plus police snipers positioned on the roof of an overlooking apartment block. Gadzhi even assigned one of his guards as our personal bodyguard inside the reception. The manager told Gadzhi there were seats for over a thousand guests at a time. At the height of the reception, it was standing room only.

At precisely two p.m. the male guests started filing in. They varied from pols and oligarchs of all sorts -- the slick to the Jurassic; wizened brown peasants from Burtunay; and Dagestan's sports and cultural celebrities. Khalid Yamadayev presided over a political table in the smaller of the two halls (the music was in the other) along with Vakha the drunken wrestler, the Ingush parliamentarians, a member of the Federation Council who is also a nanophysicist and has lectured in Silicon Valley, and Gadzhi's cousin Ismail Alibekov, a submariner first rank naval captain now serving at the General Staff in Moscow. The Dagestani milieu appears to be one in which the highly educated and the gun-toting can mix easily -- often in the same person.

After a couple of hours Dalgat's convoy returned with Aida, horns honking. Dalgat and Aida got out of the Rolls and were serenaded into the hall, and into the Makhachev family, by a boys' chorus lining both sides of the red carpet, dressed in costumes aping medieval Dagestani armor with little shields and swords. The couple's entry was the signal for the emcee to roll into high gear, and after a few toasts the Piter (St Petersburg - ed.) "gypsies" began their performance. (The next day one of Gadzhi's houseguests sneered, "Some gypsies! The bandleader was certainly Jewish, and the rest of them were blonde". There was some truth to this, but at least the two dancing girls appeared to be Roma).

As the bands played, the marriageable girls came out to dance the lezginka in what looked like a slowly revolving conga line while the boys sat together at tables staring intently. The boys were all in white shirts and black slacks, while the girls wore a wide variety of multicolored but fashionable cocktail dresses. Every so often someone would shower the dancers with money -- there were some thousand ruble notes but the currency of choice was the U.S. hundred dollar bill. The floor was covered with them; young children would scoop the money up to distribute among the dancers.

Gadzhi was locked into his role as host. He greeted every guest personally as they entered the hall -- failure to do so would cause great insult -- and later moved constantly from table to table drinking toasts with everyone. The 120 toasts he estimated he drank would have killed anyone, hardened drinker or not, but Gadzhi had his Afghan waiter Khan following him around to pour his drinks from a special vodka bottle containing water. Still, he was much the worse for wear by evening's end. At one point we caught up with him dancing with two scantily clad Russian women who looked far from home. One, it turned out was a Moscow poet (later she recited an incomprehensible poem in Gadzhi's honor) who was in town with a film director to write the screenplay for a film immortalizing Gadzhi's defense of Dagestan against Shamil Basayev. By 6 p.m. most of the houseguests had returned to Gadzhi's seaside home for more swimming and more jet-skiing-under-the-influence. But by 8 the summer house's restaurant was full once more, the food and drink were flowing, the name performers were giving acoustic renditions of the songs they had sung at the reception, and some stupendously fat guests were displaying their lezginkas for the benefit of the two visiting Russian women, who had wandered over from the reception.
The Wedding -- Day 2: Enter The Man
------------------------------------
The next day's reception at the Marrakech was Gadzhi's tribute to Aida's family, after which we all returned to a dinner at Gadzhi's summer home. Most of the tables were set with the usual dishes plus whole roast sturgeons and sheep. But at 8:00 p.m. the compound was invaded by dozens of heavily armed mujahedin for the grand entrance of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov, dressed in jeans and a t-shirt, looking shorter and less muscular than in his photos, and with a somewhat cock-eyed expression on his face. After greetings from Gadzhi, Ramzan and about 20 of his retinue sat around the tables eating and listening to Benya the Accordion King. Gadzhi then announced a fireworks display in honor of the birthday of Ramzan's late father, Ahmat-Hadji Kadyrov. The fireworks started with a bang that made both Gadzhi and Ramzan flinch. Gadzhi had from the beginning requested that none of his guests, most of whom carried sidearms, fire their weapons in celebration. Throughout the wedding they complied, not even joining in the magnificent fireworks display.

After the fireworks, the musicians struck up the lezginka in the courtyard and a group of two girls and three boys -- one no more than six years old -- performed gymnastic versions of the dance. First Gadzhi joined them and then Ramzan, who danced clumsily with his gold-plated automatic stuck down in the back of his jeans (a houseguest later pointed out that the gold housing eliminated any practical use of the gun, but smirked that Ramzan probably couldn't fire it anyway). Both Gadzhi and Ramzan showered the dancing children with hundred dollar bills; the dancers probably picked upwards of USD 5000 off the cobblestones. Gadzhi told us later that Ramzan had brought the happy couple "a five kilo lump of gold" as his wedding present. After the dancing and a quick tour of the premises, Ramzan and his army drove off back to Chechnya. We asked why Ramzan did not spend the night in Makhachkala, and were told, "Ramzan never spends the night anywhere".

After Ramzan sped off, the dinner and drinking -- especially the latter -- continued. An Avar FSB colonel sitting next to us, dead drunk, was highly insulted that we would not allow him to add "cognac" to our wine. "It's practically the same thing", he insisted, until a Russian FSB general sitting opposite told him to drop it. We were inclined to cut the Colonel some slack, though: he is head of the unit to combat terrorism in Dagestan, and Gadzhi told us that extremists have sooner or later assassinated everyone who has joined that unit. We were more worried when an Afghan war buddy of the Colonel's, Rector of the Dagestan University Law School and too drunk to sit, let alone stand, pulled out his automatic and asked if we needed any protection. At this point Gadzhi and his people came over, propped the rector between their shoulders, and let us get out of range. Postscript: The Practical Uses of a Caucasus Wedding
--------------------------------------------- --------
Kadyrov's attendance was a mark of respect and alliance, the result of Gadzhi's careful cultivation -- dating back to personal friendship with Ramzan's father. This is a necessary political tool in a region where difficulties can only be resolved by using personal relationships to reach ad hoc informal agreements. An example was readily to hand: on August 22 Chechnya's parliamentary speaker, Dukvakha Abdurakhmanov, gave an interview in which he made specific territorial claims to the Kizlyar, Khasavyurt and Novolak regions of Dagestan. The first two have significant Chechen-Akkin populations, and the last was part of Chechnya until the 1944 deportation, when Stalin forcibly resettled ethnic Laks (a Dagestani nationality) there. Gadzhi said he would have to answer Abdurakhmanov and work closely with Ramzan to reduce the tensions "that fool" had caused. Asked why he took such statements seriously, he told us that in the Caucasus all disputes revolve around land, and such claims can never be dismissed. Unresolved land claims are the "threads" the Russian center always kept in play to pull when needed. We asked why these claims are coming out now, and were told it was euphoria, pure and simple. After all they had received, the Chechen leadership's feet are miles off the ground. (A well-connected Chechen contact later told us he thought that raising nationalistic irredentism was part of Abdurakhmanov's effort to gain a political base independent from Kadyrov.)

The "horizontal of power" represented by Gadzhi's relationship with Ramzan is the antithesis of the Moscow-imposed "vertical of power". Gadzhi's business partner Khalik Gindiyev, head of Rosneft-Kaspoil, complained that Moscow should let local Caucasians rather than Russians -- "Magomadovs and Aliyevs, not Ivanovs and Petrovs" -- resolve the region's conflicts. The vertical of power, he said, is inapplicable to the Caucasus, a region that Moscow bureaucrats such as PolPred Kozak would never understand. The Caucasus needs to be given the scope to resolve its own problems. But this was not a plug for democracy. Gadzhi told us democracy would always fail in the Caucasus, where the conception of the state is as an extension of the Caucasus family, in which the father's word is law. "Where is the room for democracy in that?" he asked. We paraphrased Hayek: if you run a family as you do a state, you destroy the family. Running a state as you do a family destroys the state: ties of kinship and friendship will always trump the rule of law. Gadzhi's partner agreed, shaking his head sadly. "That's a matter for generations to come", he said.
BURNS
Well, with such a patronising approach and understanding of the Caucasus and the region being reported by its wise diplomats, the US government should not be surprised why it is so hated. Thank you WikiLeaks and to its founder, Australia's own Julian Assange for exposing this!!